Usefulness and relevance
| Characteristic Name: | Usefulness and relevance |
| Dimension: | Usability and Interpretability |
| Description: | The data is useful and relevant for the task at hand |
| Granularity: | Information object |
| Implementation Type: | Process-based approach |
| Characteristic Type: | Usage |
Verification Metric:
| The number of tasks failed or under performed due to the lack of usefulness and relevance of data |
| The number of complaints received due to the lack of usefulness and relevance of data |
The implementation guidelines are guidelines to follow in regard to the characteristic. The scenarios are examples of the implementation
| Guidelines: | Scenario: |
|---|---|
| Define the content of the information object based on the user requirements (as required by the task at hand) and also considering all other compliance requirements so that the information is relevant and legitimate | (1) Customer invoice should contain information for the customer to understand his liability and for the delivery person to understand the point of delivery and the tax department to verify the applicable tax amount. |
| Regularly monitor the changes to the internal operational environment ( business process changes etc) and find out what are the new information requirements emerge due to the changes, and provide for them by amending the information structures | (1) Time stamp became an important attribute for GRNs (goods receipts notes) when Lean manufacturing started as all raw materials are expected to receive by six hours before production (GRN-record, and the time stamp -attribute) |
| Regularly monitor the changes in the external environment find out the new information requirements emerge due to such changes and provide for such data needs | (1) Competitors' rates have become important to price the existing products during the recession period since the traditional costing method does not give a competitive price. |
| Regularly check with knowledge workers to find out how their operations/decisions can be performed better with new data available to them and provide for such data in the information system | (1) An hourly working progress report is useful in identifying the bottlenecks in production lines and balance the lines |
| Monitor and measure the user satisfaction about the information provided | (1) User satisfaction survey |
Validation Metric:
| How mature is the process to maintain usefulness and relevance of data |
These are examples of how the characteristic might occur in a database.
The Definitions are examples of the characteristic that appear in the sources provided.
| Definition: | Source: |
|---|---|
| 1) The Characteristic in which the Information is the right kind of Information that adds value to the task at hand, such as to perform a process or make a decision.
2) Knowledge Workers have all the Facts they need to perform their processes or make their decisions. |
ENGLISH, L. P. 2009. Information quality applied: Best practices for improving business information, processes and systems, Wiley Publishing. |
| 1) Can the information process be adapted by the information consumer?
2)Can the information be directly applied? Is it useful? 3) Does the information provision correspond to the user’s needs and habits? |
EPPLER, M. J. 2006. Managing information quality: increasing the value of information in knowledge-intensive products and processes, Springer. |
| Relevance of data refers to the extent to which the data meets the needs of users. Information needs may change and is important that reviews take place to ensure data collected is still relevant for decision makers. | HIQA 2011. International Review of Data Quality Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA), Ireland. http://www.hiqa.ie/press-release/2011-04-28-international-review-data-quality. |
| Relevance is the degree to which statistics meet current and potential users’ needs. It refers to whether all statistics that are needed are produced and the extent to which concepts used (definitions, classifications etc.) | LYON, M. 2008. Assessing Data Quality , Monetary and Financial Statistics. Bank of England. http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/ statistics/Documents/ms/articles/art1mar08.pdf. |
| The data includes all of the types of information important for its use. | PRICE, R. J. & SHANKS, G. Empirical refinement of a semiotic information quality framework. System Sciences, 2005. HICSS'05. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on, 2005. IEEE, 216a-216a. |
| 1) Intrinsic: The extent to which the information is new or informative in the context of a particular activity or community.
2) Relational Contextual:The amount of information contained in an information object. At the content level, it is measured as a ratio of the size of the informative content (measured in word terms that are stemmed and stopped) to the overall size of an information object. At the schema number of elements in the object level it is measured as a ratio of the number of unique elements over the total. 3) The extent to which information is applicable in a given activity. 4) The extent to which the model or schema and content of an information object are expressed by conventional, typified terms and forms according to some general-purpose reference source. |
STVILIA, B., GASSER, L., TWIDALE, M. B. & SMITH, L. C. 2007. A framework for information quality assessment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 1720-1733. |
| 1) Data are applicable and useful for the task at hand.
2) The quantity or volume of available data is appropriate. 3) Data are of sufficient depth, breath and scope for the task at hand. |
WANG, R. Y. & STRONG, D. M. 1996. Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumers. Journal of management information systems, 5-33. |
Accuracy to reality
| Characteristic Name: | Accuracy to reality |
| Dimension: | Accuracy |
| Description: | Data should truly reflect the real world |
| Granularity: | Record |
| Implementation Type: | Process-based approach |
| Characteristic Type: | Usage |
Verification Metric:
| The number of tasks failed or under performed due to lack of accuracy to reality |
| The number of complaints received due to lack of accuracy to reality |
The implementation guidelines are guidelines to follow in regard to the characteristic. The scenarios are examples of the implementation
| Guidelines: | Scenario: |
|---|---|
| Continuously evaluate if the existing data model is sufficient to represent the real world as required by the organisational need and do the necessary amendments to the data model if needed. | (1) A student who received a concession travel card is not eligible for a concession fare if he terminates his candidature before completion of the course. Hence the data model should have an extra attribute as "current status of candidature" |
| Perform regular audits on mission critical data to verify that every record has a meaningful existence in the reality which is useful for the organisation | (1) All customers existing in the customer master file actually a customer in the customer space open for the organisation. (non customers are not in the customer file) (2) "Greg Glass" is recorded as a glass work company but in fact they are opticians (3) A person's personal details taken from his educational profile may not be a correct reality for his insurance profile even though the information is |
| Perform regular audits on mission critical data to verify that every record has a unique existence in the reality | (1) It is difficult to find out that the professor "Andrew" is from Colombia university or from the university of Queensland |
| Ensure that Information available in the system is accurate in the context of a particular activity or event | (1) The driver details taken from vehicle registration may not be accurate in the case of finding the real person who drive the vehicle when an accident is caused |
Validation Metric:
| How mature is the process to ensure the accuracy to reality |
These are examples of how the characteristic might occur in a database.
| Example: | Source: |
|---|---|
| if the name of a person is John, the value v = John is correct, while the value v = Jhn is incorrect | C. Batini and M, Scannapieco, “Data Quality: Concepts, Methodologies, and Techniques”, Springer, 2006. |
| Percent of values that are correct when compared to the actual value. For example, M=Male when the subject is Male. | P. Cykana, A. Paul, and M. Stern, “DoD Guidelines on Data Quality Management” in MIT Conference on Information Quality - IQ, 1996, pp. 154-171. |
| an EMPLOYEE entity (identified by the Employee-Number
314159) and the attribute Year-of-Birth. If the value of Year-of-Birth for employee 314159 is the year the employee was born, the datum is correct. |
C. Fox, A. Levitin, and T. Redman, “The Notion of Data and Its Quality Dimensions” in Journal Information Processing and Management: an International Journal archive, Volume 30 Issue 1, Jan-Feb 1994, 1992, pp. 9-19. |
| Consider a database that contains names, addresses, phone numbers, and e- mail addresses of physicians in the state of Texas. This database is known to have a number of errors: some records are wrong, some are missing, and some are obsolete. If you compare the database to the true population of physicians, it is expected to be 85% accurate. If this database is to be used for the state of Texas to notify physicians of a new law regarding assisted suicide, it would certainly be considered poor quality. In fact, it would be dangerous to use it for that intended purpose.
24 2.1 Data Quality Definitions 25 If this database were to be used by a new surgical device manufacturer to find potential customers, it would be considered high quality. Any such firm would be delighted to have a potential customer database that is 85% accurate. From it, they could conduct a telemarketing campaign to identify real sales leads with a completely acceptable success rate. The same database: for one use it has poor data quality, and for another it has high data quality. |
J. E. Olson, “Data Quality: The Accuracy Dimension”, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 9 January 2003. |
| The patient’s identification details are correct and uniquely identify the patient. | P. J. Watson, “Improving Data Quality: A Guide for Developing Countries”, World Health Organization, 2003. |
The Definitions are examples of the characteristic that appear in the sources provided.
| Definition: | Source: |
|---|---|
| Determines the extent to which data objects correctly represent the real-world values for which they were designed. For example, the sales orders for the Northeast region must be assigned a Northeast sales representative. | D. McGilvray, “Executing Data Quality Projects: Ten Steps to Quality Data and Trusted Information”, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 2008. |
| The data value correctly reflects the real-world condition. | B. BYRNE, J. K., D. MCCARTY, G. SAUTER, H. SMITH, P WORCESTER 2008. The information perspective of SOA design Part 6:The value of applying the data quality analysis pattern in SOA. IBM corporation. |
| The data correctly reflects the Characteristics of a Real-World Object or Event being described. Accuracy and Precision represent the highest degree of inherent Information Quality possible. | ENGLISH, L. P. 2009. Information quality applied: Best practices for improving business information, processes and systems, Wiley Publishing. |
| Is the information precise enough and close enough to reality? | EPPLER, M. J. 2006. Managing information quality: increasing the value of information in knowledge-intensive products and processes, Springer. |
| 1) Each identifiable data unit maps to the correct real-world phenomenon.
2) Non-identifying (i.e. non-key) attribute values in an identifiable data unit match the property values for the represented real-world phenomenon. 3) Each identifiable data unit represents at least one specific real-world phenomenon. 4) Each identifiable data unit represents at most one specific real-world phenomenon. |
PRICE, R. J. & SHANKS, G. Empirical refinement of a semiotic information quality framework. System Sciences, 2005. HICSS'05. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on, 2005. IEEE, 216a-216a. |
| 1) The degree to which an information object correctly represents another information object, process, or phenomenon in the context of a particular activity or culture.
2) Closeness of agreement between a property value and the true value (value that characterizes a characteristic perfectly defined in the conditions that exists when the characteristic is considered. 3) The extent to which the correctness of information is verifiable or provable in the context of a particular activity. |
STVILIA, B., GASSER, L., TWIDALE, M. B. & SMITH, L. C. 2007. A framework for information quality assessment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 1720-1733. |